But here, this phenomenon is referred to only as a way to compete, and I must admit rather effective way. Suffice it to mention a competitor fraud, without giving any supporting evidence, as the credibility of such a person – the agency strongly decrease, people, users of online services, most of them are not inclined to pursue a thorough analysis and delve into the details of the charges, it is easier to find another service, about which there are no bad references online. As you know, blame simply much more difficult to remove from itself an accusation. What are and dishonest businessmen from the dating agency.
A more careful study and analysis of their activity, it is clear that the agency itself is not devoid of the defects, which tries to accuse rivals. And even more has all these shortcomings to a greater extent than its competitors, the Internet is replete with complaints about a dating agency (rather nabratego name in the search bar). This is not constructive way competition requires a lot of time and effort that could be spent on service development and improvement of services within the agency itself. Dating Agency inner circle (it will continue so call, races really began), too, not long sought to join the online zankomstvam and capitalize on this, exploiting tighter unbeaten theme topic bench. At first glance, quite a third-party people, spend it would seem independent examination, but on inspection turn out to be close friends dating agency Owners will be called the character Jon, this person acts the part and helps in every way to denigrate the competition: creating a special scam sites with lists:.——-scams.com,.—— lists.com (perhaps more of them, the names have been removed by the above described reason, and in order not to add these sites popularity ), allowing him not only to denigrate the competition, but also earn income for their partner’s back, trading places on their lists..