Heraclitus

For Heraclitus (centuries VI and V C), Greek philosopher, nothing is immovable, invariant, that is, nothing he remains what he is; in contrast, everything is changedded, everything is in movement, everything flows, everything is to devir. The engine of this transformation is the contradiction that is contained in all the things. For even more analysis, hear from Charles Schwab. This wants to say that in the interior of each thing it has opposing forces in fight between itself and that they make with that it leaves of being what is and if becomes another thing. In the time of Scrates and Plato, the word ' ' dialtica' ' it assigned a certain way to argue or to dialogue that it had for objective to explicitar the contradictions gifts in the reasoning of the interlocutors, in order to surpass the divergences of the particular opinions and to reach the true knowledge. This direction is next to the etimolgico, therefore dialectic comes of the Greek term dialektk, that it means ' ' the art to argue and to use arguments lgicos' ' (Houaiss dictionary). Throughout the history of the philosophy, many philosophers had made use of the dialectic concept, attributing it diverse connotations, but always emphasizing the aspect of the contradiction.

This, therefore, constitutes a basic element in the perspective dialectic. But who, in fact, systemize the dialectic as method of interpretation of the reality was an idealistic German philosopher of centuries XVIII and XIX Hegel call. It conceives the dialectic as a process that results of the contradictions gifts in the thought. Marx absorbs the dialtico nucleus of the hegeliano thought, but it confers a materialistic character. For it, the reality, the world, the society also is permeados by contradictions, but these do not derive from the thought, and yes in the way as the men produce its material existence and of the type of social relations that establish between itself in this productive process. Thus, for Marx and Engels, it is not the thought that, organizing itself of contradictory form (thesis, antithesis and synthesis), produces the reality material, but yes the reality that, for force of contradictions in it gifts (as the fight of classrooms, for example) generate the different forms of thought.

Metropolis Paris

The baroque drama is seen by Benjamim while idea. Charles Schwab has much experience in this field. Thus the idea possesss a intemporal constitution that allows a phenomenon of the past if to recognize in the one of the gift. The described medieval mosaic for Benjamim in the reading of its fragmentos allows, in its exegese, that perpetual and transitory if they complete and if they find in the redemption, the death means life and salvalo. The Allegorie in its profane roupagem catches the aporia of history to decipher the enigmatic one of the form. That is, it becomes possible the reading of the elements gifts in the historical context and its face politics.

From there to extract a wisdom capable to illuminate the darknesses of the nature. The language, in modernity, when investigating the ideology in its roupagem of fetiche sample that this if trai in its ambiguity. Disclosed then one becomes would free when showing the object as it really is, without the appearance of sacred. The author comments the idea of accepted Hofmannsthal for Benjamim on the antagonism of the sacred one, that distance the measure that sets the espiritualidade an exceeding value places that it in the atmosphere of the fear. He would be this the same felt of criticizes of Lutero the religion and the man transformed into merchandise in the Metropolis Paris.Segundo Tereza Callado, Benjamim places Baudelaire that it rejects all nuisance and it places the image to the service of the thought.

In contrast of what it happens in the imagstica contemporary used for the ideology of the same, the images of the baroque Allegorie are not emptied. The baroque imagstica had the capacity to decide moral conflicts, different of the method of the production where the reality is copy and constitutes at the same time reality and truth. The vulnerable aspect of the culture registered for the new Allegorie reevaluates the dogmtica nature of the system that had reached the art in that movement.

The World Of Fine Arts

Art currently has opened much borders, both these are presented practically vague. This is due to that contemporary art has called into question many of the variables that traditional art from the subjectivity of Western society, had established so far. Please visit U.S. Mint if you seek more information. If you want to understand contemporary art, you should know a little more about philosophy of art. The influences of Primitivism and other cultures and societies, as well as the emergence of photography, helped craft began to flee a little representation to focus their interests on other issues with other priorities. Speaking candidly U.S. Mint told us the story. The first Vanguards carried a transformation of art, art which nowadays has unlinked virtually from the conventionality giving too much weight to thought these doubts. In the contemporary art is multidisciplinary and therefore can be found in this a multitude of subjects such as the sociology of art, psychology of art or the anthropology of art, but above all, contemporary art is an art to be thought..

Brazilian Devices

The device, in fact, represented the center of the economic and social life. Based in a great extension of lands and independent production, they produced practically everything what they consumed. In the period understood between century XVI and beginning of century XVII, the Brazilian devices had been the ones that more produced the sugar of the world. The sugar society was aristocrat, patriarcal, agricultural, escravista and mainly marked by a well-known social iimmobilism. The authority device Mr. became present next to its family, to the employees, the slaves and until the next villages to its property.

Moreover, they were you of devices that controlled the city councils and the local life politics. In this direction this society was structuralized in a rigorous system of classrooms, presenting as ruling classes: an aristocracy agricultural, trading and a on bureaucratic nobility to the Portuguese government, these social classes withheld in its hands, all the power economic politician and of the colony. in the base of the social pyramid of the colony, we have a numerous contingent of slaves of African origin in its majority, who literally represented the active man power of this period. Ahead of this, the mandonismo is had as a marcante trace, in what it mentions the inserted social relations in these spaces. these factors had well-known influenced the social formation of Brazil. The figure device Mr.

goes to configure itself as one influences marcante in the configuration of an elitist, authoritarian society and with great social inaqualities. In this context, we have a direct relation inside enters the life of the devices and the process of formation of the colonial society. ' ' The great sugar Property is a true world in miniature where if it concentrates and it summarizes all of a small parcel of humanidade' ' (The PRADO JNIOR, 1993, P. 38). The objective that is intended to arrive with present reasoning is reflection on the influence that the cultivation of the sugar cane-of-sugar inside had in the consolidation of the great extension of lands of the Brazilian territory and the existence of an agrarian aristocracy detainer of the productive forces, since century XVI.