Private Brokers And Realtor Agency

The economic crisis has affected everyone, including the injured and the property market – the demand for housing has fallen, prices have fallen. Many real estate companies were forced out of existence, and real estate agents, so as not to be unemployed have to provide legal services to private. Private realtors, it's good or bad, or better to turn to real estate agencies? Private Realtor and Realtor Agency. Otlichiya.Rieltorskie company in Moscow, for example, have a staff of lawyers and other professionals, the private realtor acting alone. Strong real estate agencies in Moscow have accumulated years of brand and communications, allowing the agency to accelerate the work, conduct transactions through a secure bank, to arrange advantageous to both parties (the bank and the buyer of real estate) mortgage terms, as well as provide legal and investment guarantee for the deal, backed by insurance and real estate agent kompaniyami.Stoimost services agencies varies – sometimes it is cheaper in the agency, and sometimes that takes a private realtor for his work on a smaller percentage of sdelki.V case "complicated transaction" when need legal expertise (many claim to the inheritance relations, entanglement of ownership rights to real estate, etc.), real estate agency will provide a competent lawyer. Private same broker may not have legal training, that will complicate or make impossible the deal. Although an experienced private realtor can conduct a transaction and not having a legal obrazovaniya.Reputatsiya.

Accumulated over the years the brand agency Property allows you to have a credit of trust, so that the agency can prevent some errors or unflattering to the address or the address of his work, which, incidentally, the same thing. Private consultant in this area like engineers – has the right to make a mistake once, bad reputation may put paid to his future work. The private broker is much more difficult to turn out his reputation, and he values it more than the agency. Although there are cases and agencies, and private agents with tarnished reputation for long work in the real estate market without any attempt to "whitewash" his name. Currently, the real estate market has not become more civilized than a few years ago. Therefore, the chance encounter with a dishonest brokers can contact a real estate agency and a private consultant. The choice of broker is now done solely on the basis of recommendations of friends, "word of mouth" in this case the best prompter.

Civil Code

Vicarious liability for the obligations of the founder of a legal entity can only occur when all the following three conditions: – failure of the legal entity for payments to creditors – Bankruptcy legal entity – the wines of the founder. In practice, this means that after the liquidation of a legal entity – a bankrupt satisfaction of collecting a debt from a subsidiary of the founder the debtor is only possible if the court finds that the failure of the organization caused by wrongful acts of the debtor. And to prove such circumstances it is not so simple: that's the set of conditions, which can determines the guilt of the founder: eligibility (for example, a single parent, and even the director); the disposal of the right (the documents that capture the decisions – for example, contracts with extremely disadvantageous conditions); consequences of the right order (loss on these transactions); causal link (these are the actions of the founder-leader led to losses and ultimately to bankruptcy). Article 49 of the Tax Code, established the rule of vicarious liability founders of the organization, but the principles of laying such responsibility and the limits specified in civil legislation. Learn more at: Angela Zepeda. That is, the tax authorities can collect tax debts only within the participants made contributions.

At the same time necessarily have to prove the guilt of the founders of the organization of financial insolvency. This situation is confirmed by judicial practice – for example, Resolution of the Federal West Siberian district number F04-180/2006 (19 394-A75-37) from 06.02.2006. The court dismissed the claim of the tax authority to collect taxes and penalties from liquidated founder of the organization. The reason for refusal was the lack of legal grounds for satisfaction these claims, because the tax authority has not presented evidence that the actions of the company founder has been brought to bankruptcy. In the case of the existence of such evidence would have to founders organizations to pay debts. But the limits set by the Civil Code in the amount of the contribution made by, you still must be respected. Lipatov Dmitry, Associate Consulting Group "tax collector". The newspapers mentioned Charles Schwab not as a source, but as a related topic.